gjdwebserver/gjdwebserver-overlay
gjdwebserver/gjdwebserver-overlay
3
0
Fork 0
Code Pull Requests Releases Activity
5a003fc1a8
gjdwebserver-overlay/sys-kernel/pinephone-sources/files/PATCH-v3-05-14-mm-vmscan.c-refactor-shrink_node.patch
Gerben Jan Dijkman 5a003fc1a8 Added kernel
2021-07-29 22:50:48 +02:00

324 lines
12 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-26.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
USER_AGENT_GIT,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614A3C43461
for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 20 May 2021 06:54:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F1D61186
for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 20 May 2021 06:54:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
id S230499AbhETGzj (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
Thu, 20 May 2021 02:55:39 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37910 "EHLO
lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
with ESMTP id S230452AbhETGzb (ORCPT
<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
Thu, 20 May 2021 02:55:31 -0400
Received: from mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f4a])
by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 245E9C06138B
for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 19 May 2021 23:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf4a.google.com with SMTP id c5-20020a0ca9c50000b02901aede9b5061so12455193qvb.14
for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 19 May 2021 23:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20161025;
h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to
:cc;
bh=Mvah71zeYWGfuEGRbEsLqflL7nXzJ5AdEYR+UovaRYY=;
b=EbaEOCfalGO/Os4OKgi4M0ux2tbj/9YV7PKsVCGQdr/8gcQO1wsCl7ywZY/pNC7eXz
NoDBi8g1D9jnfogpVvkt+RSkZlQ/wIQfMR8guk0/qk6EZebG/utx01m5VEv0G0jHv0Zr
k6d+sXr5o4NS2Kl/7Ur6tOhmyQYo1mJS8W6wy8htCD9qRhKO9rljjjcNNoQFh7jF53I2
oqJdy/ZRwC1k/6/iastZquGfCQ1ZDPp9qbDEfPp6RfaePLHAvS2mEcu3b5IlddG8UjMG
gnQkyzTi9RZ60CdCTtFo/33uy+SQMY1vKs2glF5gunlSHFA1EaqvtsVi1W2ngxGWiGKh
ajyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
:references:subject:from:to:cc;
bh=Mvah71zeYWGfuEGRbEsLqflL7nXzJ5AdEYR+UovaRYY=;
b=fKmHfVBojnVD7v0HScBBju/h6BeYHqtiGWztHdkYBBMbAblj6OoCIkOdzbET71QBoY
R3bKjlFy/3PcckxPJrbFRhSVsTk4faV9uQfJlZuedG4G3O2EY6PeqhlGN722JnrxjpVk
og7sFMeaPJCcbmkZyC+jm4xmnS5Ox2CVjXqgw96+ViRsnfjSJ3Vvu0mOk/ab+jfZ3/ZB
HW3plDWWuAO8ijU0AazsQOOG3rvfr/szKKmeJs3e5a7HPpChkX9wvZKAnlyPw+6MvtLe
ssM2BgmFkGzG2yd8AzvepX/afdU14K4bigWqSjN8IRR7JVDnGdBKYR4N/tH0JI/apOet
Rn1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5337ZUQnuxydxDF/VBFRzHtx51o3/N5HDpf9MYMdQrx5kcdbVyhf
HEyO2/+GFcfRnTIPxodPADdKQi6qUwA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxyjS6uG8i8Sad50t/5Pf/9RTagtFbxDvAuxBuu8l0odJlhqIGjN9aFII0GYF+uFWIxSdphl51ZKHc=
X-Received: from yuzhao.bld.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:183:200:595d:62ee:f08:8e83])
(user=yuzhao job=sendgmr) by 2002:a0c:d84d:: with SMTP id i13mr3839330qvj.32.1621493648268;
Wed, 19 May 2021 23:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 00:53:46 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20210520065355.2736558-1-yuzhao@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210520065355.2736558-6-yuzhao@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20210520065355.2736558-1-yuzhao@google.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/14] mm/vmscan.c: refactor shrink_node()
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Donald Carr <sirspudd@gmail.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@yandex.ru>,
Marcus Seyfarth <m.seyfarth@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Michael Larabel <michael@michaellarabel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <michel@lespinasse.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@intel.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org,
page-reclaim@google.com, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@yandex.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Archive: <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/>
Heuristics that determine scan balance between anon and file LRUs are
rather independent. Move them into a separate function to improve
readability.
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Tested-by: Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@yandex.ru>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 186 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 5199b9696bab..2339459c97d4 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2421,6 +2421,103 @@ enum scan_balance {
SCAN_FILE,
};
+static void prepare_scan_count(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ unsigned long file;
+ struct lruvec *target_lruvec;
+
+ target_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup, pgdat);
+
+ /*
+ * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs.
+ */
+ spin_lock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock);
+ sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost;
+ sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon
+ * and file LRU lists.
+ */
+ if (!sc->force_deactivate) {
+ unsigned long refaults;
+
+ refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec,
+ WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON);
+ if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[0] ||
+ inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
+ sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_ANON;
+ else
+ sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_ANON;
+
+ /*
+ * When refaults are being observed, it means a new
+ * workingset is being established. Deactivate to get
+ * rid of any stale active pages quickly.
+ */
+ refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec,
+ WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE);
+ if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[1] ||
+ inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE))
+ sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_FILE;
+ else
+ sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_FILE;
+ } else
+ sc->may_deactivate = DEACTIVATE_ANON | DEACTIVATE_FILE;
+
+ /*
+ * If we have plenty of inactive file pages that aren't
+ * thrashing, try to reclaim those first before touching
+ * anonymous pages.
+ */
+ file = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
+ if (file >> sc->priority && !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_FILE))
+ sc->cache_trim_mode = 1;
+ else
+ sc->cache_trim_mode = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Prevent the reclaimer from falling into the cache trap: as
+ * cache pages start out inactive, every cache fault will tip
+ * the scan balance towards the file LRU. And as the file LRU
+ * shrinks, so does the window for rotation from references.
+ * This means we have a runaway feedback loop where a tiny
+ * thrashing file LRU becomes infinitely more attractive than
+ * anon pages. Try to detect this based on file LRU size.
+ */
+ if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) {
+ unsigned long total_high_wmark = 0;
+ unsigned long free, anon;
+ int z;
+
+ free = sum_zone_node_page_state(pgdat->node_id, NR_FREE_PAGES);
+ file = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
+ node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
+
+ for (z = 0; z < MAX_NR_ZONES; z++) {
+ struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[z];
+
+ if (!managed_zone(zone))
+ continue;
+
+ total_high_wmark += high_wmark_pages(zone);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Consider anon: if that's low too, this isn't a
+ * runaway file reclaim problem, but rather just
+ * extreme pressure. Reclaim as per usual then.
+ */
+ anon = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
+
+ sc->file_is_tiny =
+ file + free <= total_high_wmark &&
+ !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_ANON) &&
+ anon >> sc->priority;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Determine how aggressively the anon and file LRU lists should be
* scanned. The relative value of each set of LRU lists is determined
@@ -2866,7 +2963,6 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
struct lruvec *target_lruvec;
bool reclaimable = false;
- unsigned long file;
target_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup, pgdat);
@@ -2876,93 +2972,7 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
- /*
- * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs.
- */
- spin_lock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock);
- sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost;
- sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost;
- spin_unlock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock);
-
- /*
- * Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon
- * and file LRU lists.
- */
- if (!sc->force_deactivate) {
- unsigned long refaults;
-
- refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec,
- WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON);
- if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[0] ||
- inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
- sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_ANON;
- else
- sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_ANON;
-
- /*
- * When refaults are being observed, it means a new
- * workingset is being established. Deactivate to get
- * rid of any stale active pages quickly.
- */
- refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec,
- WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE);
- if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[1] ||
- inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE))
- sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_FILE;
- else
- sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_FILE;
- } else
- sc->may_deactivate = DEACTIVATE_ANON | DEACTIVATE_FILE;
-
- /*
- * If we have plenty of inactive file pages that aren't
- * thrashing, try to reclaim those first before touching
- * anonymous pages.
- */
- file = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
- if (file >> sc->priority && !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_FILE))
- sc->cache_trim_mode = 1;
- else
- sc->cache_trim_mode = 0;
-
- /*
- * Prevent the reclaimer from falling into the cache trap: as
- * cache pages start out inactive, every cache fault will tip
- * the scan balance towards the file LRU. And as the file LRU
- * shrinks, so does the window for rotation from references.
- * This means we have a runaway feedback loop where a tiny
- * thrashing file LRU becomes infinitely more attractive than
- * anon pages. Try to detect this based on file LRU size.
- */
- if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) {
- unsigned long total_high_wmark = 0;
- unsigned long free, anon;
- int z;
-
- free = sum_zone_node_page_state(pgdat->node_id, NR_FREE_PAGES);
- file = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
- node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
-
- for (z = 0; z < MAX_NR_ZONES; z++) {
- struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[z];
- if (!managed_zone(zone))
- continue;
-
- total_high_wmark += high_wmark_pages(zone);
- }
-
- /*
- * Consider anon: if that's low too, this isn't a
- * runaway file reclaim problem, but rather just
- * extreme pressure. Reclaim as per usual then.
- */
- anon = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
-
- sc->file_is_tiny =
- file + free <= total_high_wmark &&
- !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_ANON) &&
- anon >> sc->priority;
- }
+ prepare_scan_count(pgdat, sc);
shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
--
2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
View Git Blame Copy Permalink