gjdwebserver/gjdwebserver-overlay
gjdwebserver/gjdwebserver-overlay
3
0
Fork 0
Code Pull Requests Releases Activity
b996c0d554
gjdwebserver-overlay/sys-kernel/pinephone-sources/files/PATCH-v2-07-16-mm-vmscan.c-refactor-shrink_node.patch
Gerben Jan Dijkman b996c0d554 Added all pinephone kernels
2021-12-03 10:03:17 +01:00

325 lines
12 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-26.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
USER_AGENT_GIT,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FFEC43460
for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 06:57:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379F261278
for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 06:57:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
id S1345127AbhDMG5Z (ORCPT
<rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:57:25 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44184 "EHLO
lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
with ESMTP id S242333AbhDMG5L (ORCPT
<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:57:11 -0400
Received: from mail-qk1-x74a.google.com (mail-qk1-x74a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::74a])
by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5CAAC06138C
for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x74a.google.com with SMTP id g62so10544674qkf.18
for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20161025;
h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to
:cc;
bh=1g9DmXJ6S7uvtuGOH48osWaF0/2fGGaQ6ChmAYKTm4o=;
b=VX7vOS1iaX+Hrwo31qklSok4an751KXHjlIezhTcoCSLXRV871k6PBsw+EibR4qWwF
i7kN3+4V671SYh9T69KvNxd786HKo+6WHv6Cd77TeqTfMbKijle6EBM4m+gl3DmNgnt0
ZA8WH1LPEZfGwn3JGivnRSoUPFkulI9NBk9pGJpe7wwngua0FZfbXjlpD6td2UZKxBbD
sm8Xc+HrppZn5mA4exh2/iFeR515mlnGTrbTx70pum7Y/iYPYQ2/HgcjccRGsGWUBLbF
bSOTnALSUrqOctmdDO2fO0EzfSnndPfVgKwv5QWLNUcXAi3ZlYRs7lyuvShH4lnaJxFe
LTUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
:references:subject:from:to:cc;
bh=1g9DmXJ6S7uvtuGOH48osWaF0/2fGGaQ6ChmAYKTm4o=;
b=oh0TJS5Iv72EGLBpsE6HR3bE5cZX3J2uuz3z3TwZZpsfqvBQ4F+ZjeXnT9ZM8znSwl
DwO2yHU9V2acH3+Fw0txUASuMMXsp1h+eHsdlfoqbA5zx2G/8OJbldp/rudOwBO+wc4D
Wu7IiJYBc9jidKDE7Rputac3XOWXhSIhHMN1UGb8rIrlefaHD89A6pEKF6H/v6TSV99v
1MEtFUSmceep3K2EmUGX64fyXznC0KPZIkHHX/LcuC8xgYK2Go0LXGglt5x6U6QQ+Yk8
QGNr4pv1ynAg5b5FcA5bQe34gJ4JarQfXZx82+zF84UGh0Hj4hR4I60qEnSwVJBlCNqE
o7DA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532mqZo9PBRpK7zpxWavyuHSPxCR5uYKAcywst7dl0qA/ZdHQHKq
TyCJ6Kl6g2of6qtWwfJ7m9Y3UH3EDGM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwH+ey8nBGqYBlYs+cX0y6B8vZ/ifwsZXXs+V8u1FJGnhfXc1ufux+fOtI1iR9OnRAE6E9FqbhZIZQ=
X-Received: from yuzhao.bld.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:183:200:d02d:cccc:9ebe:9fe9])
(user=yuzhao job=sendgmr) by 2002:a0c:db82:: with SMTP id m2mr21253979qvk.37.1618297010980;
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:56:24 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20210413065633.2782273-1-yuzhao@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210413065633.2782273-8-yuzhao@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20210413065633.2782273-1-yuzhao@google.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1.295.g9ea45b61b8-goog
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/16] mm/vmscan.c: refactor shrink_node()
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Manes <ben.manes@gmail.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Michael Larabel <michael@michaellarabel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <michel@lespinasse.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@intel.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org,
page-reclaim@google.com, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210413065633.2782273-8-yuzhao@google.com/>
List-Archive: <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Heuristics that determine scan balance between anon and file LRUs are
rather independent. Move them into a separate function to improve
readability.
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 186 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 562e87cbd7a1..1a24d2e0a4cb 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2224,6 +2224,103 @@ enum scan_balance {
SCAN_FILE,
};
+static void prepare_scan_count(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ unsigned long file;
+ struct lruvec *target_lruvec;
+
+ target_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup, pgdat);
+
+ /*
+ * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs.
+ */
+ spin_lock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock);
+ sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost;
+ sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon
+ * and file LRU lists.
+ */
+ if (!sc->force_deactivate) {
+ unsigned long refaults;
+
+ refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec,
+ WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON);
+ if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[0] ||
+ inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
+ sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_ANON;
+ else
+ sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_ANON;
+
+ /*
+ * When refaults are being observed, it means a new
+ * workingset is being established. Deactivate to get
+ * rid of any stale active pages quickly.
+ */
+ refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec,
+ WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE);
+ if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[1] ||
+ inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE))
+ sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_FILE;
+ else
+ sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_FILE;
+ } else
+ sc->may_deactivate = DEACTIVATE_ANON | DEACTIVATE_FILE;
+
+ /*
+ * If we have plenty of inactive file pages that aren't
+ * thrashing, try to reclaim those first before touching
+ * anonymous pages.
+ */
+ file = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
+ if (file >> sc->priority && !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_FILE))
+ sc->cache_trim_mode = 1;
+ else
+ sc->cache_trim_mode = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Prevent the reclaimer from falling into the cache trap: as
+ * cache pages start out inactive, every cache fault will tip
+ * the scan balance towards the file LRU. And as the file LRU
+ * shrinks, so does the window for rotation from references.
+ * This means we have a runaway feedback loop where a tiny
+ * thrashing file LRU becomes infinitely more attractive than
+ * anon pages. Try to detect this based on file LRU size.
+ */
+ if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) {
+ unsigned long total_high_wmark = 0;
+ unsigned long free, anon;
+ int z;
+
+ free = sum_zone_node_page_state(pgdat->node_id, NR_FREE_PAGES);
+ file = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
+ node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
+
+ for (z = 0; z < MAX_NR_ZONES; z++) {
+ struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[z];
+
+ if (!managed_zone(zone))
+ continue;
+
+ total_high_wmark += high_wmark_pages(zone);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Consider anon: if that's low too, this isn't a
+ * runaway file reclaim problem, but rather just
+ * extreme pressure. Reclaim as per usual then.
+ */
+ anon = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
+
+ sc->file_is_tiny =
+ file + free <= total_high_wmark &&
+ !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_ANON) &&
+ anon >> sc->priority;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Determine how aggressively the anon and file LRU lists should be
* scanned. The relative value of each set of LRU lists is determined
@@ -2669,7 +2766,6 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
struct lruvec *target_lruvec;
bool reclaimable = false;
- unsigned long file;
target_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup, pgdat);
@@ -2679,93 +2775,7 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
nr_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
- /*
- * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs.
- */
- spin_lock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock);
- sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost;
- sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost;
- spin_unlock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock);
-
- /*
- * Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon
- * and file LRU lists.
- */
- if (!sc->force_deactivate) {
- unsigned long refaults;
-
- refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec,
- WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_ANON);
- if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[0] ||
- inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
- sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_ANON;
- else
- sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_ANON;
-
- /*
- * When refaults are being observed, it means a new
- * workingset is being established. Deactivate to get
- * rid of any stale active pages quickly.
- */
- refaults = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec,
- WORKINGSET_ACTIVATE_FILE);
- if (refaults != target_lruvec->refaults[1] ||
- inactive_is_low(target_lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE))
- sc->may_deactivate |= DEACTIVATE_FILE;
- else
- sc->may_deactivate &= ~DEACTIVATE_FILE;
- } else
- sc->may_deactivate = DEACTIVATE_ANON | DEACTIVATE_FILE;
-
- /*
- * If we have plenty of inactive file pages that aren't
- * thrashing, try to reclaim those first before touching
- * anonymous pages.
- */
- file = lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
- if (file >> sc->priority && !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_FILE))
- sc->cache_trim_mode = 1;
- else
- sc->cache_trim_mode = 0;
-
- /*
- * Prevent the reclaimer from falling into the cache trap: as
- * cache pages start out inactive, every cache fault will tip
- * the scan balance towards the file LRU. And as the file LRU
- * shrinks, so does the window for rotation from references.
- * This means we have a runaway feedback loop where a tiny
- * thrashing file LRU becomes infinitely more attractive than
- * anon pages. Try to detect this based on file LRU size.
- */
- if (!cgroup_reclaim(sc)) {
- unsigned long total_high_wmark = 0;
- unsigned long free, anon;
- int z;
-
- free = sum_zone_node_page_state(pgdat->node_id, NR_FREE_PAGES);
- file = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
- node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
-
- for (z = 0; z < MAX_NR_ZONES; z++) {
- struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[z];
- if (!managed_zone(zone))
- continue;
-
- total_high_wmark += high_wmark_pages(zone);
- }
-
- /*
- * Consider anon: if that's low too, this isn't a
- * runaway file reclaim problem, but rather just
- * extreme pressure. Reclaim as per usual then.
- */
- anon = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
-
- sc->file_is_tiny =
- file + free <= total_high_wmark &&
- !(sc->may_deactivate & DEACTIVATE_ANON) &&
- anon >> sc->priority;
- }
+ prepare_scan_count(pgdat, sc);
shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
--
2.31.1.295.g9ea45b61b8-goog
View Git Blame Copy Permalink